A trio of ongoing and savagely
expensive wars. A catastrophically expensive health care "system." A national
infrastructure collapsing into rack and ruin even as millions go without jobs.
Hundreds of tornadoes tearing the country apart from Oklahoma to Birmingham to
Richmond to Washington DC, yet another blow to an already fragile economy that
seems to be heading inexorably toward a double-dip recession. A brazen, headlong
conservative plunge towards the annihilation of the social contract. A game of political
chicken over the debt ceiling that could blast the country apart.
And what are we talking
about?
Birth certificates.
Welcome, my friends, to the
show that never ends.
If you've spent any time over the last couple of days watching
"mainstream" cable news channels, no doubt you found yourself
drowning in yet another round of coverage of the "birther" issue,
i.e., the accusation that Mr. Obama is not a citizen compelled the release
of his Hawaii birth certificate, which kicked off yet another round of
"It's a fake, he's not a citizen, WHAAARGARBLE!!!" nonsense from
people who only get news coverage because newsroom editors love car
accidents.
Oh, right, and royal
weddings, too. Can't forget that. "Exxon profits jump 69%" got a
line-item in the screen crawl at the bottom of CNN's broadcast on Thursday
afternoon, right beneath the talking head who gushed about getting up early
in the morning to watch the British festivities. One hopes the prince has
his own birth certificate in order. Could be trouble if not.
Don't be fooled, however.
Despite the vast hurricane of nonsense and distraction being blown over the
American people by the "news" media, by the clowns they
cover, and
by the politicians who avoid substance the way cats avoid water, there have
in fact been scores of people shouting from the rooftops about the problems
we face, and about the solutions that are not only possible, but within our
grasp if we choose to reach for them. Some of these voices are from the
present, some are from the past, yet they all share the same ignominious
fate of the perpetually ignored. The problems we face are known - they are,
indeed, standing right in front of us, stomping on our feet, and screaming
into our faces - but until now, the right combination of volume, influence,
charisma and argument have not yet coalesced into the kind of message that
will not only resonate, but will be unavoidable in its assertions.
Strange problems make
for strange solutions. In a country where people of good conscience are
ignored in favor of megalomaniacs like Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, our
society has been well-trained to sit up and pay rapt attention in
matters regarding the military. We worship at the altar of the armed
forces, and for two basic reasons:
-
Average people pay respect to those in the military because that service to our country is worthy of praise; and,
-
A few very influential people - in the defense industry, the oil industry, and the media - make vast fortunes off the defense budget and the wide coverage any military engagement is given.
In order
to keep the gravy train running, they have, over many decades, ensured
that military matters are securely wrapped in a shroud of hallowed un-touchability,
and as a culture, we have mostly swallowed this whole. We are
well-trained in this regard, and that glue holds fast.
The Trumps and Palins
of the world run their mouths into many proffered microphones and
cameras, while those interested in the genuine betterment of the nation
are dismissed and ignored. Thus it has been for some time now...but when
the military speaks, all ears turn to listen.
So be it.
The following are portions
of a paper published by the Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars (pdf) that was written by
two members of the armed services: Captain Wayne Porter of the U.S. Navy, and
Colonel Mark Mykle by of the U.S. Marine Corps. What makes the document
remarkable is the fact that both men are top-ranking members of Admiral Mike
Mullen's team. Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, surely was
aware of this paper before it was published, and allowed it to go to print,
giving this document at least a seeming stamp of approval from the Pentagon.
Something else remarkable:
two serving officers have proffered one of the more eloquent arguments in
recent memory against the direction this country has been led for decades,
and made an unassailable case for addressing the problems we face while
providing readily available solutions to those problems. It is, in the main,
a profoundly progressive piece of work.
We don't listen to
progressive politicians, public figures or media personalities - past or
present - even as the truth of their assertions and solutions burn brightly
before us. Maybe what America needs is to hear it from a couple of guys like
this. To wit:
In one sentence, the strategic narrative of the United States in the 21st century is that we want to become the strongest competitor and most influential player in a deeply inter-connected global system, which requires that we invest less in defense and more in sustainable prosperity and the tools of effective global engagement.
Among the trends that are already shaping a "new normal" in our strategic environment are the decline of rural economies, joblessness, the dramatic increase in urbanization, an increasing demand for energy, migration of populations and shifting demographics, the rise of gray and black markets, the phenomenon of extremism and anti-modernism, the effects of global climate change, the spread of pandemics and lack of access to adequate health services, and an increasing dependency on cyber networks. At first glance, these trends are cause for concern. But for Americans with vision, guided by values, they represent opportunities to reestablish and leverage credible influence, converging interests, and interdependencies that can transform despair into hope. This focus on improving our strategic ecosystem, and favorably competing for our national interests, underscores the investment priorities cited earlier, and the imaginative application of diplomacy, development, and defense in our foreign policy.
In complex systems, adaptation and variation demonstrate that "binning" is not only difficult, it often leads to unintended consequences. For example, labeling, or binning, Islamic radicals as "terrorists," or worse, as "jihadists," has resulted in two very different, and unfortunate unintended misperceptions: that all Muslims are thought of as "terrorists;" and, that those who pervert Islam into a hateful, anti-modernist ideology to justify unspeakable acts of violence are truly motivated by a religious struggle (the definition of "jihad," and the obligation of all Muslims), rather than being seen as apostates waging war against society and innocents. This has resulted in the alienation of vast elements of the global Muslim community and has only frustrated efforts to accurately depict and marginalize extremism.
As Americans, our ability to remain relevant as a world leader, to evolve as a nation, depends as it always has on our determination to pursue our national interests within the constraints of our core values. We must embrace and respect diversity and encourage the exchange of ideas, welcoming as our own those who share our values and seek an opportunity to contribute to our nation. Innovation, imagination, and hard work must be applied through a national unity of effort that recognizes our place in the global system. We must accept that to be great requires competition and to remain great requires adaptability, that competition need not demand a single winner, and that through converging interests we should seek interdependencies that can help sustain our interests in the global strategic ecosystem. To achieve this we will need the tools of development, diplomacy and defense - employed with agility through an integrated whole of nation approach. This will require the prioritization of our investments in intellectual capital and a sustainable infrastructure of education, health and social services to provide for the continuing development and growth of America's youth; investment in the nation's sustainable security - on our own soil and wherever Americans and their interests take them, including space and cyberspace; and investment in sustainable access to, cultivation and use of, the natural resources we need for our continued well-being, prosperity and economic growth in the world marketplace.
As Americans we needn't seek the world's friendship or to proselytize the virtues of our society. Neither do we seek to bully, intimidate, cajole, or persuade others to accept our unique values or to share our national objectives. Rather, we will let others draw their own conclusions based upon our actions. Our domestic and foreign policies will reflect unity of effort, coherency and constancy of purpose. We will pursue our national interests and allow others to pursue theirs, never betraying our values. We will seek converging interests and welcome interdependence. We will encourage fair competition and will not shy away from deterring bad behavior. We will accept our place in a complex and dynamic strategic ecosystem and use credible influence and strength to shape uncertainty into opportunities. We will be a pathway of promise and a beacon of hope, in an ever changing world.
(Emphasis added)
It is not a perfect
document by any means, and many progressives may recoil at the deep vein of
militarism woven throughout the work. Consider, however, the fact that here
is a well-crafted argument for slashing military spending, resolving the
health care crisis in a way that benefits people instead of profit, refining
the way we educate our children so that educational funds are not an
afterthought, fixing our crumbling national infrastructure, and turning away
from the decades-old habit of approaching our national existence from a
position of strife, distrust, conflict and war. Here, in short, is a
blueprint for a progressive future that speaks to all the problems we face.
Consider this, also: you
almost certainly have a friend, a spouse, a family member, or a neighbor who
has been gulled into believing that anything liberal or progressive is by
definition heretical to the idea that is America. They vote for the
politicians who screw them and support a system that steals from them, but
cannot be convinced to turn away from either.
Perhaps those people you
know would find themselves receptive to a progressive argument made by a
Marine officer and a Naval officer who both work in the Pentagon. We are,
after all, a culture that attaches great significance to military service.
Here are two service members speaking to the needs of the future while
wearing the uniform. Here is a progressive perspective wrapped securely in
the flag.
Give
it a read, and share it around. See what happens. Maybe these messengers
are just different enough to make a difference.
* See Bud Meyers related post - Why is all our money spent on defense?
* See Bud Meyers related post - Why is all our money spent on defense?
* William Rivers Pitt is a Truthout editor and columnist. He is also a New
York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's
Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.
No comments:
Post a Comment