Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Greg Gutfeld (Fox News "Red Eye") Makes Ass of Himself

If you can, watch the Fox News Red Eye "Half-time Report" from tonight when they discussed Occupy Wall Street. Greg Gutfeld made a total ass out of himself in a discussion with Andy Levy.

Greg Gutfeld said that if the Occupy Wall Street protesters got bailed out and had their college loans forgiven, he'd go on the street to protest.

PARAPHRASED....

Andy Levy : "Oh, so it's OK to bail out the banks?"
Greg Gutfeld : "That's different, the government gave them that money."
Andy Levy : "The government? Aren't we the government?"
Greg Gutfeld : "That's different. The bankers weren't camping out in a park saying 'give me a bail out, give me a bail out.'"
Andy Levy : "No, the bankers were in their million-dollar penthouse suites saying 'give me a bail out, give me a bail out.'"

It's common knowledge that, like the Republicans, Fox News pimps for the wealthiest 1%. So seeing Greg shamelessly pimp for the banks was no surprise. But seeing Andy Levy so skillfully counter Greg's insanely lame argument was priceless!

To join the exclusive 1% club, Americans need a minimum annual income of $516,633 according to the Tax Policy Center.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Breaking News! Fox News Defends Occupy Wall Street!

'Occupy Wall Street' -- It's Not What They're for, But What They're Against

By Sally Kohn | Published October 14, 2011 | FoxNews.com

Critics of the growing Occupy Wall Street movement complain that the protesters don’t have a policy agenda and, therefore, don’t stand for anything. They're wrong. The key isn’t what protesters are for but rather what they’re against -- the gaping inequality that has poisoned our economy, our politics and our nation.

In America today, 400 people have more wealth than the bottom 150 million combined. That’s not because 150 million Americans are pathetically lazy or even unlucky. In fact, Americans have been working harder than ever -- productivity has risen in the last several decades. Big business profits and CEO bonuses have also gone up. Worker salaries, however, have declined.

Most of the Occupy Wall Street protesters aren’t opposed to free market capitalism. In fact, what they want is an end to the crony capitalist system now in place, that makes it easier for the rich and powerful to get even more rich and powerful while making it increasingly hard for the rest of us to get by. The protesters are not anti-American radicals. They are the defenders of the American Dream, the decision from the birth of our nation that success should be determined by hard work not royal bloodlines.

Sure, bank executives may work a lot harder than you and me or a mother of three doing checkout at a grocery store. Maybe the bankers work ten times harder. Maybe even a hundred times harder. But they’re compensated a thousand times more. The question is not how Occupy Wall Street protesters can find that gross discrepancy immoral. The question is why every one of us isn’t protesting with them.

According to polls, most Americans support the 99% movement, even if they’re not taking to the streets. In fact, support for the Occupy Wall Street protests is not only higher than for either political party in Washington but greater than support for the Tea Party. And unlike the Tea Party which was fueled by national conservative donors and institutions, the Occupy Wall Street Movement is spreading organically from Idaho to Indiana. Institutions on the left, including unions, have been relatively late to the game.

Ironically, the original Boston Tea Party activists would likely support Occupy Wall Street more as well. Note that the original Tea Party didn’t protest taxes, merely the idea of taxation without representation -- and they were actually protesting the crown-backed monopoly of the East India Company, the main big business of the day.

Americans today also support taxes. In fact, two-thirds of voters -- including a majority of Republicans -- support increasing taxes on the rich, something the Occupy Wall Street protests implicitly support. That’s not just anarchist lefty kids. Soccer moms and construction workers and, yes, even some bankers want to see our economy work for the 99%, not just the 1%, and are flocking to Occupy protests in droves. I’ve even met a number of Libertarians and Tea Party conservatives at these protests. So the critics are right, the Occupy Wall Street movement isn’t the Tea Party. Occupy Wall Street is much, much broader.

Maybe it’s hard to see your best interests reflected in a sometimes rag-tag, inarticulate, imperfect group of protesters. But make no mistake about it: While horrendous inequality is not an American tradition, protest is. And if you’re part of the 99% of underpaid or unemployed Americans crushed in the current economy, the Occupy Wall Street protests are your best chance at fixing the broken economy that is breaking your back.

Sally Kohn is the founder and Chief Education Officer of the Movement Vision Lab, a grassroots think tank. Follow her on Twitter@sallykohn

Sally Kohn

Moderator: I couldn't have said it better myself...I and the 99% thank you!

View Article at Fox News

#OccupyWallStreetNYC

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Eric Bolling & Fox News Bash Occupy Wall Street

From Wiki: "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is staffed with policy specialists, lobbyists and lawyers. Politically, the Chamber is generally considered to be a conservative organization, but supports candidates from both parties. The Chamber is one of the largest lobbying groups in the U.S., spending more money than any other lobbying organization on a yearly basis."

At 1 PM PST on Fox News Eric Bolling was berating the Occupy Wall Street crowd for marching on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, saying "96% of its members are small businesses." 

And Bolling also kept calling them all "anti-capitalists", which they are not...they're just "anti-corporations". On the bottom of the TV screen Fox News put "ANTI-CAPITALISTS".

Eric Bolling also criticized the OWS crowd for "bashing banks" -- but aren't you a very tiny minority if you're NOT bashing the banks these days?

But what Eric Bolling (as a Fox News corporate spin merchant) failed to mention was that only 11% of all small American businesses actually belongs to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce


From the U.S.C.C. web site: "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world’s largest business federation representing the interests of more than 3 million businesses of all sizes, sectors, and regions, as well as state and local chambers and industry associations. More than 96% of U.S. Chamber members are small businesses with 100 employees or fewer."

From the government's Small Business Administration's website: "In 2009, there were 27.5 million businesses in the United States, according to Office of Advocacy estimates. The latest available Census data show that there were 6.0 million firms with employees in 2007 and 21.4 million without employees in 2008. Small firms with fewer than 500 employees represent 99.9 percent of the total ( employers and non-employers), as the most recent data show there were about 18,311 large businesses in 2007." - Source: Office of Advocacy estimates based on data from the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Census Bureau, and trends from the U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Business Employment Dynamics.

Karl Rove can also incorporate himself as a "small business" and join the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Does that mean he speaks for America and most small businesses?

And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce promotes "free trade" for "free labor" in countries overseas (see my post about slave wages and sweat shops: America's Race to the Bottom). Meanwhile most of us want "fair trade" with "fair" wages here at home in America.

But most informed people already know that Fox News and their commentators like Eric Bolling are all full of crap anyway. So maybe this post wasn't needed after all.

Also in the News:

Occupy DC organizers expect more than 1,000 for march to U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Protesters march to Chamber of Commerce (photos)

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

American Vets Educate Sean Hannity

Recently, Sean Hannity called the Occupy Wall Street protesters un-American. In response, Henry James Ferry interviewed a few Marine vets at Zuccotti Park in NYC. The Marines stated why they had come to protest and in direct response to Hannity's statement: One said "F**k Off" and the other replied: "That's the biggest load of shit I've ever heard"

Night after night, every night it seems, I hear Sean Hannity cry like a baby. Boo-hoo! Poor Sean! The pain, suffering, and deprivation you must be suffering! I weep for you dear man. No millionaire should ever have to endure the hardships you do. I pity and pray for you dear man. I really do. Boo-hoo!

Tonight it was Sean Hannity again, and again, whining like a stuck pig about taxes...while his co-host was calling the Occupy people left-wing communists backed by George Soros.

In case you don't know who this spoiled and greedy child is, Sean Hannity is a New York-born radio host and TV personality on Fox News, and has an estimated net worth of $35 million dollars. He is also the author of three New York Times bestsellers.

In July of 2003, the outspoken New York-born conservative ass paid $3,450,000 for a home set on just over two acres in Huntington, New York on the North Shore of Long Island.

Nice mansion you squealing pig!



Tonight on his Fox News show he was also whining about how high his property taxes were, "I live in one of highest taxed areas in the country!"

You poor man! Boo-hoo Sean!

But your property taxes have nothing to do with federal income taxes. What is it that I always hear you preaching to the rest of the world? "Take personal responsibility for your own actions. Plan ahead. Don't spend what you can't afford." Didn't you know what your property taxes would before you bought that beautiful beachfront mansion in that exclusive neighborhood? If you can't afford it, move to a cheaper neighborhood.

What is it that you always preach to us? "Live within your means."

And when you purchase a car or house, you can most likely pay cash-in-full. The rest of us "normal" people have to take out 3-5 year auto loans and 30-year mortgages and pay interest to the bank. And the greater percentage of our income is spent on food and electricity for heat...that's peanuts for you.

Sean whines about his state sales tax too. Boo-hoo!

But Sean, poor people pay the same tax rate as you do, but they also spend a greater proportion of their incomes in sales tax than you do too - mostly in consumption when they buy just the basic necessities they need to live on.

But yet, night after night Sean Hannity weeps himself to sleep when he thinks about having to pay the same federal income tax rate as the rest of us.

Sean whines more than most poverty-stricken people do. Poor Sean. Boo-hoo! I wonder how much Mother Teresa whined about her standard of living.

Sean Hannity is just another greedy and whining rich Republican smear merchant - just like his other co-worker at Fox News, the rich corporate pimp Bill O'Reilly.

GOP and Fox News "Don't report crimes committed by bankers!"

Fox Business reporter Charlie Gasparino, who refers to financial whistleblowers as “rats,” claimed that the new Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections are hurting the big banks:

GASPARINO: If you create all these incentives to sue. Well it seems like we’re increasing litigation at a time against businesses at a time when you know lets face it, all these banks, they’re getting hammered. You just saw that ugly chart of Goldman Sachs..."

Freshman Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) sponsored a bill specifically to repeal the whistleblower law. Grimm’s legislation is a wish-list for corrupt banks: it would not only reduce rewards for reporting fraud, but would force whistleblowers to report crimes to their supervisors before notifying authorities.

Rep. Steve Stivers (R-OH), a lawmaker-turned bank lobbyist-turned lawmaker again, is among the team of four legislators working to whip up support for the legislation. Stivers and Grimm have been showered with contributions from top Wall Street firms, including JP Morgan and Bank of America.

While it is unlikely that Grimm’s measure is passed and signed into law as a stand-alone bill under President Obama, it could be forced through by the Republicans using a budget stand-off or another debt ceiling hostage situation. > Full Story

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Is Bill O'Reilly Good For America?

Over these past 3 years we've become painfully aware of what Wall Street and the American multi-national corporations (and their Republican enablers) have done to us over the last 40 years; and so it makes me wonder what other economic carnage they've created abroad in foreign countries. If it's anything like here, it's no wonder so many people hate Americans.

And why would anyone even vote for a Republican, it's beyond me...unless they were (or aspired to be) very rich. But most of us will never be rich, no matter how hard we try. Generally speaking, I bear no animosity towards a person of wealth, just those who would use trickery, bribes, backroom deals, deception, shell games, treason, and murder to amass digital dollars at the expense of common honest workers. These are the people Republicans represent. Being a Republican isn't cool. Friends don't let friends vote Republican.

But with only two political parties in America, and millions of people with varying degrees of political opinions and beliefs, we are limited as to who we associate with and vote for in elections.

Bill O'Reilly (and most of the other Fox News pundits) always try very hard to depict anyone associated with the Democratic Party as being a "far-left-wing loon".

Does this make me a "loon" or a "smear merchant"? If so, then I'll wear that label as a badge of honor.

While yes, I can see why a Communist or a Socialist would affiliate themselves with the Democrats, just as the more moderate and sensible Progressives would also align themselves with the Democratic platform, because THAT party is more about the representation of THE PEOPLE and common workers.

But that doesn't mean ALL Democrats are "far-left wing loons" (or me), even though, to the extreme far-left we might find a few anarchists.

On the other hand, the GOP, besides just corporations, is more representative of the upwardly mobile white upper-class and the very wealthy, just as with the Koch brother's Tea Party. White supremacists, the Aryan Nation, and other paramilitary groups might be more inclined to associate themselves with the Republicans also. In this group on The Right we'll also find the socially conservative evangelistic white Southern Baptists that don't believe in evolution, those who might have once supported slavery in America; but yet they still support slavery in foreign nations - where labor is cheap. "Free markets" and Free Trade" are code words for "Free Labor" (Read my post: America's Race to the Bottom).

And just like on the far-left, on the far-right we might also find anarchists. There are probably just as many "far-right loons" as there are "far-left loons". But what I can't understand is why multi-millionaires like Bill O'Reilly spends so much time and effort trying to label half the country as anarchists.

Glenn Beck did this too, before Fox News fired his ass for being too far right, even for Rupert Murdoch's taste. Beck was definitely a "far-right loon", and look at how many followers he had at his Restoring Honor rally that he held at the Washington Monument while attempting to compare himself to a "conservative" or Libertarian  version of Dr. Martin Luther King (talk about an ego!)

The commentators at Fox News have an agenda to marginalize those that disagree with corporate rule in this country. They are, after all, Rupert Murdoch's and the Koch brothers talking heads. By labeling ALL Democrats as "far-left-wing loons" just because a few are taken out of context, doesn't make it true.

The same could be said for some of those at the Tea Party rallies, those that support "Free Trade", while the labor unions just ask for "fair" trade and "fair" wages.

And while it's true that most Communists and Socialists might align themselves with the Democrats, I also suspect that Nationalists and Fascists might align themselves with the Republicans (They're not called Re-thug-licans for nothing).

Bill O'Reilly and his cohorts at Fox News can mock those at the Occupy Wall Street protests, and they can try very hard to marginalize them and make them look ignorant and silly to their audience, just because as Americans, the protesters are exercising their Constitutionally guaranteed rights to peacefully assemble; but then the Fox News crew had probably said the same things about the Civil Rights movement too (more on this here). The Fox News Nation pundits claim they support our war veterans, but what would they think and say about this man?

And yet, I wouldn't classify all those at Fox News as being "loons" (those who are crazy or deranged). And to the best of my knowledge, Bill O'Reilly certainly isn't an anarchist. To me, they're just slimy and greedy Republican corporatists that pimps for wealthy plutocrats.

Related Post: Bill O'Reilly Fears "Left Wing Loons" Rioting in America

Related Post: Bill O'Reilly is just an Uber-Rich Con Artist

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Why I Hate Republicans: And the Fox News Channel (Media Release)

Why I Hate Republicans: And the Fox News Channel (by Bud Meyers*)

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1466220554/

https://www.createspace.com/3670197

To the best of my knowledge I know of no one else who has dedicated an entire 800 page book on the subject. I feature the "99ers" (those who are the long-term unemployed), those who the GOP and Fox News has deliberately misled the public about...turning public sentiment against them. They depicted the jobless as lazy and "gaming the system", except when it was politically expedient for them to use the jobless numbers to discredit the Obama administration.

I monitored everything they said about the unemployed (many times with names, times, and dates), and read the articles posted on their websites; and read what others like Media Matters and Newshounds were saying.I wrote counter-arguments to the GOP's and Fox News' false claims...as it was the only thing I could do, besides just screaming at my TV set. (they never once replied to over 100 emails I sent them, and I tried using various email addresses too.)

As one of those unemployed that the Republicans and Fox "News" falsely and maliciously misrepresented, I took it very personally, because after exhausting all my unemployment benefits, I almost took my own life earlier this year.Ali Velshi on CNN acknowledged me on his show one day just 3 weeks away from my last day on earth. (Someone alerted his producer of a blog post I wrote) A stranger saw Ali's show, and a newspaper article about me, and emailed me through my Facebook page, and offered me a place to stay.

No thanks to the GOP and Fox News, I'm alive today to have written this book and my blog.

* I authored, edited, proof-read, formatted, and self-published the entire book, as well as designed the book cover and added a few photos inside. I take full credit (or full blame) for everything contained therein; all the information is based on my own personal experience. I also wrote for the Fox News Wall of Shame which is not maintained nor updated...an orphaned project.

Why I Hate Republicans

Monday, August 15, 2011

Black or White, We're All the Same

White people used to see a lot of black faces on TV complaining about the inequity of our economic system. We didn't pay too much attention to them at the time because we believed what the media and the Republicans were telling us about government entitlements (welfare and food stamps).

We saw all those black faces on our TVs complaining about job discrimination and unfair wages, but we didn't pay too much attention at the time because we weren't black, we weren't discriminated against, we had jobs, and we believed what the Republicans were telling us about minorities - those lazy people who milked the system for government hand-outs.

The white people (being a majority) were the privileged ones in our society (we always got hired first and were paid more), and we were taught that it was the minorities and immigrants who were the lazy thieves, who lived out of our pockets, and who caused us all our unnecessary trouble by filing all those "frivolous" lawsuits.

And "those people" had the god-awful nerve to call us racists too! How dare they!

As the majority of the population, we weren't necessarily racists, but we may have been prejudiced by the media propaganda and the Republican political machinery for reporting their slant on the poor and down-trodden in this country. The Republicans turned us (the whites) against them (everyone else) by having us believe that it was all their fault for not improving their own lot in society.

The Republicans drove the wedge between the middle-class and poor, turning one class against the other - divide and conqueror - always being the strategy to keep the powerful white elitists in control. The white folks believed these powerful people because they were all like them (white), and so therefore, they must have been telling them the truth.

The Republicans made the issue about "people of color", rather than just economic status, because once that hadn't been such a huge issue for white people. When we once thought of unemployment, we though of lazy black winos, because most white people had jobs paying a living wage at that time, and the media and Republicans had us believing their lies.

But recently, over the past several years we've seen the difference between our white masters and all those poor black people. And we realized that it wasn't color that divided us, but our economic status. Poor white people were labeled as "trailer park trash", and I need not say what minorities were accused of being.

But now, during this Great Recession, with millions of white people who previous worked hard all their lives, we see that they too are also being accused of being lazy freeloaders by the elitists, just because they had been laid off from their jobs and were also forced onto the government dole to survive.

And it was the white elitists who also wanted us to think that illegal immigrants took all the jobs that we wanted, because now there are so few jobs for anyone. But in reality, the jobs were outsourced to the Chinese, who might be a minority here, but make up the largest percent of the global population.

And while the ranks of white people have joined the class of poor and share poverty with the minority population, we hear an emerging group of black Republican political leaders preaching what the powerful white elitists have been shoving down our throats for the last 200 years.

So, now that THEY (black GOP politicians) have a good-paying job, have a title, wear a suit, and have a little power, the whole political landscape has changed. It's just like when any poor drunk man in the gutter needs help; or if they belonged to a union for healthcare insurance to provide for his family (like Glenn Beck did with AFTRA). They changed their position on economic inequity after THEY THEMSELVES became wealthy or obtained positions of power and "respect" (whether it be just from honest hard work, or because of incredibly good luck, or both). They now walk among, and brush elbows with, the very people who once cruelly oppressed them and unfairly criticized them for their class in society.

Drunks become conservative talk show hosts. Trailer park trash become rock stars. Lazy black men become NBA's most valuable players. Poor men become rich men. Successful men becomes the haters of failed men.

Now we have a handful of black men on TV accusing millions of white people (and black people) of being lazy and collecting welfare. My, have the tables turned! And in the next 50 years it's predicted that whites will become a minority in this country...Hispanic children in California already dominate the demographics there.

So, maybe those lazy black men (whose ancestors picked cotton 14 hours a day under the hot humid Southern skies) weren't so lazy after all. Maybe they were discriminated against for jobs, and maybe they were FORCED to go on the government dole for their very survival. And maybe that's why a disproportionate group of black and Hispanic men are in prison for engaging in criminal activities - to earn money to live on, because they weren't given the opportunity to wear a suit to work....IF they were ever given a job by the wealthy white elitists.

The white elitists have used race to divide the country for two centuries, providing the best economic opportunities for the whites. And it wasn't until minorities joined labor unions that they overcame the discrepancy in job opportunities and pay. And because people of color make up such a large portion of union membership these days, the Republicans like to literally use the face of the labor unions to disparage those that are represented by the Democrats.

Whites have left the unions over the years, both voluntarily as they moved on to white-collar jobs, or because their jobs were outsourced to China and Mexico. Many whites were forced to take low-paying jobs at McDonald's and became "trailer park trash" when the local factory moved overseas for cheaper labor. Many local communities became ghost towns. Whites took the jobs that only blacks were once relegated to do. Whites were forced to go on the government dole when THEY TOO were discriminated against for age (or for just being presently unemployed). Whites were forced to accept welfare and food stamps because corporate CEOs found ways to increase their executive pay and corporate profits without hiring them.

Whenever I see an old black and white movie on TV (no pun intended) from the 1940s, the whites had all the good jobs, and many dressed glamorously and were rich and drove the fancy cars. The blacks were always the maid or butler. Now Africa-American culture is more intertwined than every before in our media, music, the workplace, and even in our politics. They are now mainstream (except for maybe in Tea Party Country, such as in some small pockets of Kentucky and Georgia) Unlike the 1930's of the Deep South, now when we see a black man on the street wearing a suit, we don't stop and stare. It's "normal".

A young black man in Hollywood could have his shoes shined by an old white man, but it doesn't matter what color they are, the shoe shine "boy" will always pay a higher tax rate than the movie star.

"Those people" (successful African-American men) are just as normal these days as are any lazy unemployed white bum who collects a government hand-out. Michael Steele, Herman Cain, and Allen West all work for the white enlists now; they don't give a damn about ANY poor people. They're just like Glenn Beck, because they themselves aren't poor...so therefore, just because THEY survived and prospered, everybody else must be a lazy free-loading bum without any boot straps.

Ironic, how we've come full circle. I just hope that when the Hispanic community out-numbers the whites in 2050, they won't take all the jobs that whites want to do! (sarcasm) But I'll be dead by then, so I won't be around to witness that. And besides, I'm already a lazy white unemployed food stamp bum now anyway. The Republicans made sure of that, and Fox News made sure you knew that.

It's always been a class war being waged by the rich against the poor. And today, the poor are getting hammered good. Whenever I look into a mirror, I don't see a black man or a white man, I just see a poor man.