Showing posts with label Herman Cain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Herman Cain. Show all posts

Monday, October 24, 2011

The History of Banking

Forward

I'm guessing that it isn't prostitution that's the world's oldest profession, but bartering and trading, when early man was a hunter-gatherer. Then banking might be the second oldest profession.

We hear a lot of complaints and criticisms about the ideologies of capitalism, socialism, communism, Marxism, fascism, and Zionism; but I believe that the real problem for the past four thousand years has been the ideology of usuryism (as in usury or bankingism, acquiring wealth from someone else's labor).

I've heard Fox News pundits and politicians say that the Occupy Wall Street protesters don't know why they're protesting. Herman Cain recently criticized them, saying, "Don't blame Wall Street. Don't blame the big banks. If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself." (Cain is either very naive or very deceitful, I think the latter.)

The "occupy" protests are very similar to the anti-globalization movement (G-8 protests) that have been going on for years, which were critical of globalization and corporate capitalism. The Occupy Wall Street protesters know what they're protesting, and they know exactly who to blame...big banks and the big multi-national corporations. Just because Herman Cain personally benefited from corporations and banks, doesn't make them morally right.

When Herman Cain was asked to join the Kansas City Federal Reserve, he thought: " 'Wow, the Federal Reserve wants me to serve on one of its boards!' That was something I had never really thought about, but it seemed pretty prestigious.”

So Herman Cain (and those like him) know exactly what the protesters want (and who benefits for advocating for the corporations and banks) and who the protesters are blaming and why. Herman Cain says the protesters shouldn't blame Wall Street, and should march on the White House instead.

But if Herman Cain (being a corporate CEO and a chairman of the Kansas City branch of our central bank) knows anything about history, he should know who calls all the shots, and it isn't the politicians, but the bankers. Our president is a figure head, just like Ben Bernanke is a figure head for the Federal Reserve.

Ordinary citizens have to march on the banks, not the White House. The President can't do anything about the banks without congressional action to nationalize our banking system. It's those who own the Federal Reserve that are the real people in power.

And Herman Cain should know this. Anything else, any arguments, any crisis, any finger-pointing, any scandal, any crime, any war, any natural disaster, any presidential debate, and any criticism from people like Herman Cain, is just a welcomed distraction from the people who really rule the world. If they want you to look one way, I'd look the other way. (More on this below).

We know it was the banks who collapsed our economy, and how they put millions of people in debt with bad underwater mortgages. We know how they put millions of people out of work; now we have ask ourselves why, and would someone defend the banks?

History of Banking

The first banks were the merchants of the ancient world that made loans to farmers and traders that carried goods between cities. The first records of such activity dates back to around 2000 BC in Assyria and Babylonia - both Semitic kingdoms in ancient Mesopotamia. Later, in ancient Greece and during the Roman Empire, lenders based in temples would make loans, but also added two important innovations: accepted deposits and changing money.

In ancient Rome moneylenders would set up their stalls in the middle of enclosed courtyards called macella on a long bench called a bancu, from which the words banco and bank are derived. As a moneychanger, the merchant at the bancu did not so much invest money as merely convert the foreign currency into the only legal tender in Rome, that of the Imperial Mint.

With the ascent of Christianity, banking became subject to additional restrictions, as the charging of interest was seen as immoral. After the fall of Rome, banking temporarily ended in Europe and was not revived until the time of the Crusades around 1095 (a series of religious wars, blessed by the Pope and the Catholic Church with the main goal of restoring Christian access to the holy places in and near Jerusalem.)

But most early religious systems in the ancient Middle East (the historical origin of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) and the secular codes arising from them, did not forbid usury. These societies regarded inanimate matter as alive, like plants, animals and people, and capable of reproducing itself. Hence if you lent 'food money', or monetary tokens of any kind, it was legitimate to charge interest.

The Torah, and later sections of the Hebrew Bible, criticize interest-taking, but interpretations of the Biblical prohibition vary. One common understanding is that Jews are forbidden to charge interest upon loans made to other Jews, but obliged to charge interest on transactions with non-Jews, or Gentiles.

Israelites were forbidden to charge interest on loans made to other Israelites, but allowed to charge interest on transactions with non-Israelites, as the latter were often amongst the Israelites for the purpose of business anyway. But in general, it was seen as advantageous to avoid getting into debt at all, and to avoid being bound to someone else (becoming a slave to debt).

The original "merchant banks" were first invented in the Middle Ages by Italian grain merchants. Many displaced Jews who were fleeing Spanish persecution, were attracted to the trade. They brought with them their ancient practices from the Middle and Far East silk routes. Originally intended for the finance of long trading journeys, these methods were applied to finance the production and trading of grain.

The Jews could not hold land in Italy, so they entered the great trading piazzas and halls of Lombardy, alongside the local traders, and set up their benches to trade in crops. They had one great advantage over the locals...the Christians were strictly forbidden the sin of usury, defined as lending at interest (Islam makes similar condemnations of usury).

The Jewish newcomers, on the other hand, could lend to farmers against crops in the field, a high-risk loan at what would have been considered usurious rates by the Church; but the Jews were not subject to the Church's dictates. In this way they could secure the grain-sale rights against the eventual harvest. They then began to advance payment against the future delivery of grain shipped to distant ports. In both cases they made their profit from the present discount against the future price. This two-handed trade was time-consuming and soon there arose a class of merchants who were trading grain debt instead of actual grain.

The Jewish trader performed both financing (credit) and underwriting (insurance) functions. Financing took the form of a crop loan at the beginning of the growing season, which allowed a farmer to develop and manufacture (through seeding, growing, weeding, and harvesting) his annual crop. Underwriting in the form of a crop, or commodity, insurance guaranteed the delivery of the crop to its buyer, typically a merchant wholesaler. In addition, traders performed the merchant function by making arrangements to supply the buyer of the crop through alternative sources—grain stores or alternate markets, for instance—in the event of crop failure. He could also keep the farmer (or other commodity producer) in business during a drought or other crop failure, through the issuance of a crop (or commodity) insurance against the hazard of failure of his crop.

In the middle of the 13th century, groups of Italian Christians invented legal fictions to get around the ban on Christian usury; for example, one method of effecting a loan with interest was to offer money without interest, but also require that the loan is insured against possible loss or injury, and/or delays in repayment. The Christians effecting these legal fictions became known as the Pope's usurers, and reduced the importance of the Jews to European monarchs. Later, in the Middle Ages, a distinction was drawn between things which were consumable (such as food and fuel) and those which were not, with usury being permitted on loans involving the latter.

Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (the oldest surviving bank in the world) was founded in 1472 by the Magistrate of the city state of Siena, Italy, as a mount of piety. It took over Papal banking monopolies from rivals in nearby Siena and became tax collectors for the Pope throughout Europe. The Papal bankers were the most successful of the Western world and has been operating ever since. Today it consists of approximately 3 thousand branches, 33 thousand employees and 4.5 million customers in Italy, as well as branches and businesses abroad. A subsidiary, MPS Finance, handles investment banking.

The oldest surviving bank in the world is in Italy.



By the later Middle Ages, Christian merchants who lent money with interest were without opposition, and the Jews lost their privileged position as money-lenders.

The medieval Italian markets were disrupted by wars and were limited by the fractured nature of the Italian states, so the next developments happened as banking practices spread throughout Europe during the Renaissance Era. Banking offices were usually located near centers of trade, and in the late 17th century, the largest centers for commerce were the ports of Amsterdam, London, and Hamburg.

The next generation of bankers arose from migrant Jewish merchants in the great wheat-growing areas of Germany and Poland. Many of these merchants were from the same families who had been part of the development of the banking process in Italy. They also had links with family members who had, centuries before, fled Spain for both Italy and England. As non-agricultural wealth expanded, many families of goldsmiths (another business not prohibited to Jews) also gradually moved into banking. Berenberg Bank is the oldest private bank in Germany, established in 1590 by Hans and Paul Berenberg in Hamburg.

In the sixteenth century, Marrano Jews (Sephardic Jews) fleeing from Iberia introduced the techniques of European capitalism, banking, and even the mercantilist concept of state economy to the Ottoman empire. In the sixteenth century, the leading financiers in Istanbul were Greeks and Jews. Many of the Jewish financiers were Marranos who had fled from Iberia during the period leading up to the expulsion of Jews from Spain. Some of these families brought great fortunes with them. The most notable of the Jewish banking families in the sixteenth century Ottoman Empire was the Marrano banking house of Mendes, which moved to and settled in Istanbul in 1552 - and under the protection of Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent. When Alvaro Mendes arrived in Istanbul in 1588, he is reported to have brought with him 85,000 gold ducats. The Mendès family soon acquired a dominating position in the state finances of the Ottoman Empire and in commerce with Europe.

The Marrano Jews thrived in Baghdad during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries under Ottoman rule, performing critical commercial functions such as money-lending and banking. Like the Armenians, the Jews could engage in necessary commercial activities, such as money-lending and banking.

Court Jews were Jewish bankers or businessmen who lent money and handled the finances of some of the Christian European noble houses, primarily in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Court Jews were precursors to the modern financier or Secretary of the Treasury. Their jobs included raising revenues by tax farming, negotiating loans, master of the mint, creating new sources for revenue, negotiating loans, floating debentures, devising new taxes, and supplying the military. In addition, the Court Jew acted as personal bankers for nobility, raising money to cover the noble's personal diplomacy and his extravagances.

Examples of what would be called the Court Jews emerged when local rulers used services of Jewish bankers for short-term loans. They lent money to nobles, and in the process gained social influence. Noble patrons of court Jews employed them as financiers, suppliers, diplomats and trade delegates. Court Jews could use their family connections, and connections between each other, to provision their sponsors with, among other things, food, arms, ammunition and precious metals. In return for their services, court Jews gained social privileges, including up to noble status for themselves, and could live outside the Jewish ghettos. Some nobles wanted to keep their bankers in their own courts. And because they were under noble protection, they were exempted from rabbinical jurisdiction. One of the most notable families engaged in this activity was the Rothschild Family that created the a banking empire that had branches all over Europe.

Throughout 17th century, precious metals from the New World, Japan and other locales have been channeled into Europe, with corresponding price increases. Thanks to the free coinage, the Bank of Amsterdam, and the heightened trade and commerce, Netherlands attracted even more coin and bullion. These concepts of "fractional-reserve banking" (which is used today) and these payment systems went on and spread to England and elsewhere.

The London Royal Exchange was established in 1565. At that time moneychangers were already called bankers, though the term "bank" usually referred to their offices.

By the end of the 16th century and during the 17th, the traditional banking functions of accepting deposits, money-lending, money changing, and transferring funds were combined with the issuance of bank debt that served as a substitute for gold and silver coins.

By the end of the 17th century, banking was also becoming important for the funding requirements of the relatively new and combative European states. This would lead on to government regulations and the first Central Banks.

The main developers of banking in London were the goldsmiths, who became depositories of gold and silver holdings. The goldsmiths soon found themselves with money for which they had no immediate use, and they began to lend the money out at interest to both the merchants and the government. Finding substantial profit in this business, they began to solicit deposits and pay interest on them. The goldsmiths eventually discovered that the deposit receipts they provided were being passed on from one person to another in lieu of payment in coin, which prompted them to begin lending paper receipts rather than coins. By promoting acceptance of the receipts as a means of payment, the goldsmiths discovered they could lend more than the gold and silver coin they had on hand, a practice that became known as fractional-reserve banking.

These practices created a new kind of "money" that was actually debt, that is, goldsmiths' debt rather than silver or gold coin, a commodity that had been regulated and controlled by the monarchy. This development required the acceptance in trade of the goldsmiths' promissory notes, payable on demand. Acceptance in turn required a general belief that coin would be available; and a fractional reserve normally served this purpose. Acceptance also required that the holders of debt be able legally to enforce an unconditional right to payment; it required that the notes (as well as drafts) be negotiable instruments. The concept was well developed by the 17th century.

Meanwhile, the credit of the British Crown had been diminished in 1672. The monarchy's urgent need for funds at rates lower than those charged by the goldsmiths led in 1694 to the establishment of the Bank of England. In 18th-century London the Bank of England had a monopoly over corporate banking, and even large partnerships were prohibited. But private banks, though relatively small personal enterprises, continued to find profitable business in discounting merchants' bills. In the latter half of the century small banks in country towns grew rapidly in number and needed "correspondent" banks in London with which they could deposit and invest funds. The London banks in turn settled accounts in Bank of England notes, and by the end of the century many kept their own deposit accounts with the Bank of England. A structure that led to the development of the concept of a Central Bank.

In 1690, the Massachusetts Bay Colony became the first to issue paper money in what would become the United States, but soon others began printing their own money as well. The first attempt at a national currency was during the American Revolutionary War in 1775. The Continental Congress began issuing its own paper currency, calling its bills "Continentals". In 1791, which was after the U.S. Constitution was ratified, the government granted the First Bank of the United States a charter to operate as the U.S. central bank until 1811. The Second Bank of the United States was established in 1816, and lost its authority to be the central bank of the U.S. twenty years later under President Jackson when its charter expired. Both banks were based upon the Bank of England. (Ultimately, a third national bank, known as the Federal Reserve, was established in 1913 and still exists to this day.)

Jews were founders and leaders of many of the important early European banks, as well as significant banks in the newly formed United States. Several Jewish bankers became extremely influential, successfully competing with non-Jewish banking houses in the floating of government loans.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild (23 February 1744 – 19 September 1812) was the founder of the Rothschild family international banking dynasty that became the most successful business family in history. The Rothschild family (known as The House of Rothschild, or more simply as the Rothschilds) is a European family of German Jewish origin that established European banking and finance houses starting in the late 18th century. Five lines of the Austrian branch of the family have been elevated to Austrian nobility being given hereditary baronies of the Habsburg Empire by Emperor Francis II in 1816. The British branch of the family was elevated to British nobility at the request of Queen Victoria. It has been argued that during the 19th century, the family possessed by far the largest private fortune in the world as well as by far the largest fortune in modern world history. The Japanese government approached the London and Paris Rothschild families for funding during the Russo-Japanese War. The Rothschild family is highly secretive: "They were Jews, and were particularly concerned that details could be used to promote anti-Semitism." The Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialization of Europe, and they were instrumental in supporting railway systems across the world and in complex government financing for projects such as the Suez Canal. (In 2005, Forbes magazine referred to Mayer Amschel Rothschild as a "founding father of international finance".)

Mayer Amschel Bauer (founder of the Rothschild family): "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."

Lord Rothschild: "Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand. The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes".

Nathan Mayer Rothschild: "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply." The Rothschild banking family, a financial dynasty of German Jewish origin, is a dynasty without a country.

In the 19th century, the rise of trade and industry in the U.S. led to powerful new private merchant banks. Citigroup dates back to the founding of: the City Bank of New York (later Citibank) in 1812; Bank Handlowy in 1870; Smith Barney in 1873, Banamex in 1884; Salomon Brothers in 1910.

In 1824 the Chemical Bank of New York was first chartered, and through a series of takeovers and mergers, eventually culminated into the J.P. Morgan & Co. of today. In 1892 John Pierpont Morgan arranged the merger of Edison General Electric and Thomson-Houston Electric Company to form General Electric. In 1901 J.P. Morgan and Andrew Carnegie began investing in steel mills together. J.P. Morgan & Co opened in 1935. Chase Manhattan Bank was formed by the merger of the Chase National Bank and the Bank of the Manhattan Company in 1955. Chase Manhattan Bank merged with J.P. Morgan & Co. in 2000. 

In 1852 Henry Wells and William Fargo founded Wells, Fargo & Co in the gold rush port of San Francisco. In 1858, Wells Fargo helped start the Overland Mail Company. In 1861, Wells Fargo also took over operations of the western leg of the famed, but short-lived, Pony Express. In 1866, Wells Fargo combined all the major western stage lines. Stagecoaches bearing the name Wells, Fargo & Co. rolled over 3,000 miles of territory.

PNC Financial Services traces its history to the Pittsburgh Trust and Savings Company which was founded in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1852. U.S. Bank traces some of its earliest roots to 1853 when Farmers and Millers Bank in Milwaukee first opened its doors.

Goldman Sachs was founded in 1869 by Marcus Goldman who came from an Ashkenazi Jewish family in Germany. Goldman immigrated to New York City and hung out a shingle on Pine Street in lower Manhattan, with the legend Marcus Goldman & Co., setting himself up as a broker of IOUs. In 1882, Marcus Goldman invited his son-in-law Samuel Sachs to join him in the business and changed the firm's name to M. Goldman and Sachs. On December 4, 1928, it launched the Goldman Sachs Trading Corp. During the 20th century the financial world began incorporating and corporations came to dominate the banking business. Goldman's famous philosophy was being "long-term greedy", which implied that as long as money is made over the long term, trading losses in the short term were not to be worried about.

The Federal Reserve and Modern Banks

The Federal Reserve System (also known as the Federal Reserve, and informally as the Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. It was created on December 23, 1913. The Federal Reserve System's structure is composed of the presidentialy appointed Board of Governors* (or Federal Reserve Board), the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation, numerous privately owned U.S. member banks and various advisory councils.

* According to the Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve is independent within government in that "its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government." (WTF?) However, its authority is "derived" from the U.S. Congress and is "subject" to congressional "oversight". See the Federal Reserve Act - See Who owns the Federal Reserve (More links below about the Fed in 2011 at the end of this article.)

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." - Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States (1913-1921).

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world, no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the U.S. on his death bed for passing the Federal Reserve System.

Bank of America's history dates back to 1904, when Amadeo Giannini founded the Bank of Italy in San Francisco to cater to immigrants who were denied service from other banks. In 1922, Giannini established Bank of America and Italy in Italy by buying Banca dell'Italia Meridionale, itself only established in 1918. On March 7, 1927, Giannini consolidated his Bank of Italy with the newly formed Liberty Bank of America to form the Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Association. In 1928, A. P. Giannini merged with Bank of America, Los Angeles and consolidated it with his other bank holdings to create what would become the largest banking institution in the country. He renamed the Bank of Italy on November 3, 1930, calling it Bank of America.

In the U.S. during the Great Depression, after so many banks had failed, the Securities and Exchange Commission was established in 1933 and the Glass–Steagall Act was passed which would separate investment banking and commercial banking. This was to try and avoid the more risky investment banking activities from causing bank failures for commercial banks ever again.

FDR: "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."

Morgan Stanley was founded during this time in 1935. Some of the employees of J.P. Morgan & Co., most notably Henry S. Morgan and Harold Stanley, left J.P. Morgan & Co. and joined some others to form Morgan Stanley.

Joseph Kennedy: "Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."

Henry Ford: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

During the post World War II period two organizations were created: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Encouraged by these institutions, commercial banks started to lend to sovereign states in the third world. This was at the same time as inflation started to rise in the west. The Gold Standard was eventually abandoned in 1971 and a number of the banks were caught out and became bankrupt due to third world country debt defaults.

Modern Banking

In the 1960 the first Automated Teller Machines (ATM) were developed and the first machines started to appear by the end of the decade; and by the 1970s the first electronic payment systems had emerged. These included debit cards, credit cards, electronic funds transfers, direct credits, direct debits, internet banking and e-commerce payment systems.

Global banking and capital market services proliferated during the 1980s after deregulation of financial markets in a number of countries. The 1986 'Big Bang' in London allowing banks to access capital markets in new ways, which led to significant changes to the way banks operated and accessed capital. It also started a trend where retail banks started to acquire investment banks and stock brokers creating universal banks that offered a wide range of banking services. The trend also spread to the U.S. after much of the Glass–Steagall Act was repealed in the 1980s. This saw U.S. retail banks embark on big rounds of mergers and acquisitions and also engage in "investment banking activities". Universal banks were created and participated in many kinds of banking activities and is both a commercial bank and an investment bank. The regulatory barrier to the combination of investment banks and commercial banks had largely been removed.

George Carlin: "You have owners - they own you - and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all the information you get to hear. They’ve got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want. Well we know what they want: they want more for themselves and less for everybody else."

The consolidation was accomplished through acquisitions which grow in size over this period, and there were many of them. By the end of 2000, a record level of financial services transactions with a market value of $10.5 trillion occurred, and the top ten banks commanded a market share of more than 80%.

The Last Banking Crisis

The 2008 financial crisis caused significant stress on banks around the world. The failure of a large number of major banks resulted in government bail-outs. The collapse and fire sale of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan Chase in March 2008 and the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September that same year led to a credit crunch and global banking crises.

In response, governments around the world bailed-out, nationalized, or arranged "fire sales" for a large number of major banks. These events spawned the term "too big to fail"...and today, they still are.

The banks that got the most government help in late 2008 and early 2009 also invested the most to influence members of Congress, the White House, the Federal Reserve, Treasury Department and a long list of federal agencies as new rules were enacted governing Wall Street.

JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. declined to comment on their lobbying spending, which went toward hiring advocates to discuss the legislation with lawmakers and regulators. Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., PNC Bank, US Bancorp, Capital One Financial Corp., Regions Financial Corp., and the American Bankers Association all lobbied heavily.

On April 14, 2011, the United States Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a 635-page report that alleged that Goldman Sachs may have misled investors and profited from the collapse of the mortgage market at the expense of its clients. Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan), Chairman of the Subcommittee, said he would refer the report to the Department of Justice for further investigation.

On June 2, 2011, following an "exploratory" meeting with the Manhattan district attorney, Goldman was subpoenaed for relevant information. Goldman is expected to accept a deferred-prosecution agreement if charges are filed. A deferred-prosecution is when a prosecutor agrees to grant amnesty in exchange for something. (A bribe maybe?)

Conclusion

Some strong words in the video below from Elizabeth Warren about why Wall Street is to blame.

The PBS documentary from Bill Still called the "The Money Masters" is maybe the best documentary ever made on the subject of the history of banking. The U.S. Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank, and it's name is a complete deception to trick the American citizens and to enslave them - just as England did since the founding of the Bank of England. The Rothschild family banking dynasty is probably the most major player - they almost own the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. Yet, the Rothschild's try to stay out of the public light and work through their many henchman (i.e. the politicians and media contacts.)

Watch the documentary Inside Job: The Film that Cost Over $20 Trillion to make to better understand the financial crash of 2008. And read the book The Shock Doctrine to better understand our "free market" economic system. Also read Third World America: How Our Politicians Are Abandoning the Middle Class and Betraying the American Dream. And also The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance Destroyed Our Jobs, Pensions, and Prosperity.

The bottom line is...the banks weren't "failing" at all. Taxpayers in the United States (and around the world) were forced to pay quick profits to all the banks. All the bank's losses were incurred by taxpayers. Society, as we know it, could completely break down, and total anarchy could prevail throughout the entire world, but the bankers would have the least to fear for their very survival. They have always survived through the centuries of their financed wars, disease, and man-made famines. It was only the masses that perished.

Today we have Herman Cain running for President of the United States of America, and what does he want? Besides being in a "prestigious" position, he also wants more of the same.

Now we have a movement called Occupy Wall Street...and the rest, as they say, is history.

Ten Biggest Banks in the World

(Rankings and market caps fluctuate and vary with asset values, market caps, and stock prices.)

  • BNP Paribas is the largest bank of the world with assets of $2.846 Trillion. The bank has headquarters in Paris, France with second global headquarters in London. (Founded early 1820s)
  • The second largest bank of the world with $2.715 Trillion of assets is Deutsche Bank (est.1870). The bank has headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany.
  • The Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is the third largest bank of the world with assets of $2.481 Trillion (est.1880). It is one of the main companies of Mitsubishi Group and has headquarters in Tokyo, Japan.
  • With the total assets of $2.465 Trillion, French based Credit Agricole is the fourth largest bank of the world. (est.1861) Credit Agricole has headquarters in Paris, France.
  • The fifth largest bank of the world with $2.454 Trillion of assets is HSBC Holdings, located in London, United Kingdom. The origins of the bank lie in Hong Kong and Shanghai, where branches were first opened in 1865
  • Barclays is the sixth largest bank of the world with total assets of $2.388 Trillion. This bank traces its origins back to 1690 when John Freame and Thomas Gould started trading as goldsmith bankers in Lombard Street, London. The bank’s headquarter One Churchill Palace is located in London, United Kingdom.
  • The seventh largest bank of the world is one of the oldest banks of the world (1727), Royal Bank of Scotland with the assets of $2.328 Trillion. The bank has headquarters in Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Bank of America has $2.264 Trillion of assets which makes it the eighth largest bank of the world. HQ Charlotte North Carolina.
  • With assets of $2.118 Trillion, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the ninth largest bank of the world. HQ New York City.
  • The New York City based Citigroup is tenth largest bank of the world with assets of $1.913 Trillion.

-Here are the Top 50 Banks in the World -

- Here is a list of Banks from the FDIC that Failed Since 2000 -

The Federal Reserve in 2011:

* PROPOSAL: The financial system can't just be "reformed", the entire banking system of the United States would have to be totally restructured and nationalized, using the Armed Services for enforcement if necessary. It would be a government bank (like a community bank) owned by the people. Two elected boards would be put in place, one for domestic banking and one for international finance and investment. There would only be one central bank, with thousands of branch offices throughout the country, with one set rate of interest for borrowing for each category: with all interest earned from personal, auto, and home loans being paid into the U.S. Treasury, instead to privately-held commercial banks. The money supply would no longer be hoarded by the top 1%, but would be circulated and redistributed among the 99%. All military and law enforcement agencies would be working for the people, not for the banks. The 1% would be put in prison if they resist, or they can work for the government (us). Details later.

And then there is the Pope: "The Papal bankers were the most successful of the Western world and has been operating ever since."

(This article was sourced and edited  from various wikipedia articles, unless where hyperlinks indicate otherwise.)

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Herman Cain Tax Plan a Win-Win-Win for the Rich

...but it will also be a heavy burden on the poor, low income, and working-class folks...not to mention a drain on the tax revenues needed to fund Social Security and Medicare.

But before I go on my rant about Herman Cain's tax plan, let me first explain why ANY Republican tax plan will be designed to achieve one thing, and one thing only...to redistribute MORE wealth to the top 1%.

For years, since the days of Ronald Reagan, I've always associated myself with the Republican Party. I naively bought in to the concept that what's good for my boss (the CEO) would also be good for me, that prosperity would also rain down on me...the now-infamous trickle down theory, the idea that tax breaks or other economic benefits provided by government to businesses and the wealthy will benefit poorer members of society by improving the economy as a whole.

But since I've been unemployed for these past 3 years and have researched this theory further, I've found this not to be true. Now that I'm on "the other side of the fence" so to speak (outside the economic circle), I know for a fact, that it's not true.

I know that most Republican voters still cling to this belief, and will continue to vote against their own best interests. I know what Republicans think and believe, and early on during the Tea Party movement, I also believed in their ideas too. I was once one of them. But the times, the economic playing field, and my own personal circumstances, have allowed be to finally see the light.

I sometimes think what Ronald Reagan would think about the calloused and irresponsible people the Republicans have in their Party today. Holding unemployment benefits hostage for extending tax breaks for the rich? Holding the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government hostage for cuts in social programs for the poor? That's not the America that my father served in two wars for. George H.W. Bush wanted to soften some of Reagan's programs and promised "a kinder and gentler nation" What happened to that nation?

The Republican's sudden and so-called concern over debt and deficits is completely bogus. After all, most of our current debt was acquired under George W. Bush: Bush spending, Bush wars, and Bush tax cuts. This is an indisputable fact. Republicans (in all levels of government) had just as many (if not more) earmarks as did the Democrats.

It all comes down to this one simple statement: Large corporate interests, by proxy through their Republican puppets, do not mind using YOUR tax dollars to spend on defense, corporate subsidies, government contracts and other programs that THEY can benefit from, but they don't want YOU to use THEIR tax dollars to spend on programs that THEY don't need or could benefit from - such as Social Security and Medicare.

Now the Republicans, by holding the nation's credit hostage, has forced upon us an unconstitutional Super Committee to decide this for us.

But then again, hasn't that been the Republican Master Plan all along, by deliberately starving tax revenues to FORCE cuts in spending to social programs and safety nets for the working-class, while letting the rich completely off the hook?

We keep hearing from the Republicans, "We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem." But in truth, the exact opposite is true. While yes, we can be more conservative in our government spending, and look to reign in corruption, abuse, and waste (such as Republican Florida Governor Rick Scott, who ran a company involved in the nation's largest Medicare fraud case.) But for the last ten years since the Bush tax cuts, we have indeed had a serious revenue problem. And now with high unemployment, even more so.

From 2005 to 2010, Herman Cain wrote a weekly commentary for his company The New Voice, Inc. He dedicated a few of his columns to register full support for President George W. Bush’s disastrous idea to privatize Social Security. Viewing Social Security as “immoral” and “oppressive,” Herman Cain blasted Democrats for supporting the “involuntary servitude” of African Americans through the Social Security and payroll tax system.

Herman Cain says “I’m very proud of the relationship I have with the Koch brothers as well as Americans For Prosperity.” The Koch brothers have a campaign to kill Social Security and Americas for Prosperity even has an indoctrination program to turn school kids against this very popular social program -- maybe so when they're older, they'll vote against it.

With all the "occupy" protests going on around the country (and the rest of the world) railing against corporate greed, political injustice, corruption in government, and income inequality, one would NOT expect "more of the same" regarding a tax policy like the 9-9-9 Plan from Herman Cain. Wouldn't that be very badly ill-timed right now? But Herman Cain pushes forward, as though nothing were happening (and I suspect that he and those like him, would also ignore a full scale uprising as well.)

The GOP has accused everybody else of wanting to "spread the wealth around", but in truth, it's been they who've been sucking it all to the top 1% for the last 40 years!

The inside scoop on Herman Cain's 9-9-9 Tax Scam Plan is finally revealed! The problem with the 9-9-9 Plan...SOLVED!

I'll completely skip commenting on the part of Herman Cain's 9-9-9 Tax Plan where he proposes a 9% National Sales Tax, because it's become common knowledge by now that it would disproportionately tax the poorest people, who spend the greater part of their income in consumption. So I'll move on from there.

Herman Cain says his tax plan "provides the least incentive to evade taxes". Who evades taxes? Wealthy people with off-shore bank accounts might; and multi-national corporations who do business overseas and out-source jobs could also. But most average people have no say and have no way to "evade" or "dodge" taxes. They don't have tax attorneys looking for loop holes in the tax code. And besides, most average people have their taxes automatically taken out of their paychecks by their employers. If they're lucky, they'll get a refund from the IRS the following year.

Herman Cain says his plan "lifts a $430 billion dead-weight burden on the economy due to compliance, enforcement, and collection". How? By eliminating more jobs such as H&R Block tax preparers and IRS auditors? I suppose most taxpayers will have no problem with this...except the ones who lose their jobs of course. And I suppose Tim "Turbo-Tax" Geithner wouldn't complain either.

Herman Cain boasts that "increased capital per worker drives productivity" This part is confusing. Does this mean more money goes into the bosses' pockets while the employee works harder? I couldn't understand this part.

And Cain's tax plan says it will repeal the 16th Amendment (which also allows for collecting property taxes). Article I, Section 9, Clause 4: This clause basically refers to a tax on property, such as a tax based on the value of land. Does this also mean no taxes on mansions, corporate jets, and yachts?

Cain's 999 plan also states "lowest marginal rates on production". I think this means ending the higher tax rates for the wealthy, as "production" refers to wealthy people, as in "productive" people. That's how we discreetly refer to very rich people now..."productive people".

How the Rich will Get Richer

Herman Cain's tax plan "eliminates double taxation of dividends" This part I fully understand. It gives the rich more tax breaks.

If Herman Cain earns a dollar from his pizza business and pays a corporate income tax, then pay himself a salary, Cain say his salary shouldn't be taxed because his business has already paid a tax. Hence "double taxation". (You've heard about Herman Cain's loaf of bread economy haven't you?)

The first taxation occurs at the company's year-end when it must pay taxes on its earnings (corporate taxes). Herman Cain wants corporate taxes lowered from 35% to 9%. But because of a myriad breaks and loopholes that other countries generally do not offer (such as China, who has a 25% corporate tax), American corporations rarely pay this "effective" rate, and many pay no taxes at all, and actually get a subsidy from taxpayers....such as the most profitable company in human history, Exxon Mobil.

The second taxation Cain refers to occurs when the shareholders, such as company executives like CEOs and those on the board of directors, who pay themselves the bulk of their salaries in stock options. They receive dividends, which come from the company's after-tax earnings. Cain doesn't want to tax CEOs (and others) on these dividends.

Also, when CEOs and company executives sell these stocks (and have a "realized capital gain"), they pay less tax than they would on regular income in the form of a capital gains tax. (You heard about Warren Buffett's secretary, right?) Herman Cain also wants a zero tax on these earnings as well! (it used to be 20% under Bush, but is now at 15%)

Keeping All the Money in the Top 1%

And if one of these very wealthy CEOs, hedge fund managers, or bankers passes away? Herman Cain wants to end inheritance taxes completely, keeping all their accumulated wealth in the top 1%. (It's an estate tax, but Cain calls this "the death tax", the same way they referred to "death panels"....giving it a negative connotation to make it sound as terrible as possible. But it's only terrible when poor people are made MORE poor. And that's what the Republicans are striving for.)

Currently the estate tax only affects estates of considerable size, over $5 million for an individual and $10 million for couples -- but it also provides numerous credits (including the unified credit) that allow a significant portion of even large estates to escape taxation - with a maximum tax rate of 35% above the exemption. The maximum estate tax, gift tax, and generation-skipping tax rate was 55% before the Bush tax cuts.

So Herman Cain (and his wealthy Koch brothers backers) want much lower corporate taxes, to pay no taxes on dividends, pay no taxes on capital gains, and pay no inheritance tax. Silly me...and here I thought we had a problem with budgets and deficits. Or is it just Social Security and Medicare? I guess that means we'll just have to wipe out Social Security and Medicare completely. It's "wasteful spending" and "we" can't afford it any longer without enough tax revenues. But hey! Let's give the oil companies more subsidies! That's not wasteful spending!

"Hey, John Boehner! I thought you said we don't have a revenue problem!"

So Herman Cain's 9-9-9 Tax Plan is a win-win-win for wealthy corporate executives and ubber-wealth people (the top 1%), but only offers a meager income tax break for those living below the official government poverty level, which is only $10,890 a year for a single person. Big frigging deal!

Herman Cain has many years of experience as a CEO, so he knows what CEOs would like for a tax plan. Thanks a lot Herman Cain!

The True Republican Master Plan

But it's not just Herman Cain who subscribes to this tax policy -- ALL Republicans are attempting to starve tax revenues to FORCE cuts in spending in social programs and safety nets for the working-class, while letting the rich completely off the hook. Ever since Social Security and Medicare was first initiated for the working-class, the rich and powerful industrialists and bankers (and their GOP puppets) have been totally against it. After you bust your ass all your life, working to make them rich, they don't want you to have healthcare and a pension when you get too old and sick to work any longer - - - when you are no longer beneficial to them. Now you're just "wasteful spending", you don't contribute, you're obsolete, you're no longer of any use to them. Now they just want to bury you in a hole like garbage.

Let me repeat, it all comes down to one simple statement: Large corporate interests, by proxy through their Republican puppets, do not mind using YOUR tax dollars to spend on defense, corporate subsidies, government contracts and other programs that THEY can benefit from, but they don't want YOU to use THEIR tax dollars to spend on programs that THEY don't need or could benefit from - such as Social Security and Medicare.

Herman Cain once worked for the Federal Reserve and is part of Corporate America, and therefore is a part of the problem. He and his nine-nine-nine tax plan would only be a win-win-win for the rich, and a lose-lose-lose for everyone else. "How dare you insult my intelligence sir!"

But ANY Republican tax plan will be designed to achieve one thing, and one thing only...to redistribute MORE wealth to the top 1%. So even Republican voters get screwed unless they're multi-millionaires.

ALSO READ:

Herman Cain - A National Narcissistic Joke

Herman Cain's 999 Tax Plan is a Shell Game

Herman Cain and the Fair Tax

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Herman Cain - A National Narcissistic Joke

nar·cis·sism (närs-szm) also nar·cism (-szm) n. - A psychological disorder
  1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself.
  2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem.
  3. The attribute of the human psyche characterized by the abnormal admiration of oneself.
  4. Out of touch with common people, cannot relate to, or with, the normal human condition.

Before Libya's Muammar Gaddafi went into hiding after an armed rebellion by the Libyan people (because he raped and pillaged the country), was the Libyan leader always going on national TV and telling his people, "That's what the people want."

The Republicans do, all the time. "That's what the American people want." Why are they always telling us what we want, when in fact, we don't want their same old crap at all! But yet, they still keep repeating that same mantra over and over again - as though maybe, if they say it often enough, they'll get a consensus of the people, and we'll start to believe them.

And that's what really pisses me off. The Republicans must really think that the American people are very, very, stupid. Are we? Or is it just Republican voters who are? But regardless, Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain must think I'm very stupid indeed!

And what's scary is, this week Herman Cain leads the pack with 27% of the Republican voters in the polls! That's an awful lot of dumb and stupid Americans, because there can't be that many Republican millionaires or corporate CEOs.

I wish Bill O'Reilly would get Body Language expert Tonya Reiman on his show and analyze Herman Cain, who rarely smiles and always licks his lips when he speaks in his interviews. He always seems to be so angry at the American people all the time. Why? Is it because we have the nerve to doubt his preposterous schemes?

Herman Cain was on Meet the Press this morning. He said the Liberals aren't mismanaging the economy, they're deliberately trying to destroy it (I'd say Bush and the Republicans already destroyed it...remember 2008?)

Herman Cain says with his 999 Tax Plan, taxes will go up for some "some people" [the poor], but that the cost of their goods and services will also go down, because there will be no more invisible taxes. (He used the "loaf of bread" economic theory.)

Herman Cain said the Occupy Wall Street people were "stupid" and protesting the wrong people, that they should be protesting at the White House for failed economic policies (I guess Herman Cain wasn't paying attention to what the banks and other corporations have been doing while he was making pizzas.)

And can Herman Cain read English? He says the people protesting Wall Street don't know what they want, but if Herman can read, all the protest signs in over 950 protests in 80 cities around the world are clearly stating the same thing...and that is what they DON'T want. It doesn't take a damn rocket scientist to figure that out. Maybe Americans aren't so stupid after all, maybe Herman Cain is.

If Herman Cain had read this Fox News article or had watched this un-aired Fox News interview, Herman Cain might have a much better understanding of what the "occupy" protesters (the 99%) were all about and what they want...and it's certainly not Herman Cain, or his screwy 999 Tax Plan (no matter how many times he tells us).

But yet, he tells the American people that "yes", that is exactly what we want. If Herman Cain really believes this, then he is just as out of touch with the 99% as the other 1% is.

The Herman Cain 999 Tax Plan is nothing more than a shell game: It taxes the poor more, and taxes the rich less, just like all the other Republican millionaires and their corporate hacks want to do. They are all narcissistic assholes.

(BELOW) Herman Cain - Then and Now

Besides Herman Cain, all the Republicans, and many Democrats, here's some more narcissistic Jokes...

# How many narcissists does it take to change a light bulb?
None, a narcissist will always manage to find someone else to carry out a menial chore like that.

# What is one way to irritate a narcissist?
Pretend to enjoy doing the lowly menial chores which the narcissist has given you to do. It will make the narcissist think that he or she is missing out on something.

# What's a narcissist's idea of being a "slave"?
Not being able to boss everyone else about.

# What is a narcissist's idea of equality?
Being equally bossy to everyone else

# Why does a narcissist find it so difficult to empathize with others?
Because he (or she) is always so busy empathizing with himself (or herself)

# What's a narcissist's definition of "rubbish"?
(like social programs) Items which take up space in the narcissist's house but which belongs to someone other than the narcissist.

# What's a narcissist's idea of generosity?
Giving away things which the narcissist considers to be rubbish.

# What do you call a narcissist who is never envious of others?
Exceptional!

# What is a narcissist's idea of being abused?
Occasionally having to go along with someone else's preferences.

# Why do narcissists indulge in projection?
It's not narcissists that indulge in projection, its you that indulges in projection. - you are so devoid of empathy and you always want lots of attention and if I dare to criticize you, you always fly off the handle and you go on and on and on about it and you never let me get a word in edge-wise and as well as that you are always being charming to people when they are present and later on you always want to criticize them behind their backs! (pause for a deep breath)

# What's a narcissist's idea of hard work?
Arranging for lots of other people to do all the chores.

# Why does a narcissist find it tiring to have lots of visitors?
Who said that acting wasn't tiring? (the narcissist has to present a false image to those whom he/she feels the need to impress. However, if the visitors stay long enough the narcissist might eventually let his/her guard down (and the visitors might see a truer picture).

# Why do narcissists feel the need to control other people?
Perhaps it makes up for them not being able to control themselves.

# What do you call a narcissist who can graciously accept criticism or blame?
Dead.

# What do you call a narcissist who can get through a whole day without criticizing someone?
Unfeasible! Narcissists have to criticize others incessantly, despite the fact that they cannot bear to receive criticism.

# How can you tell when a narcissist is telling lies?
His/her lips are moving (narcissists feel a need to lie. It is regarded as an intrinsic part of his/her defenses)

# What's a narcissist's idea of compromise?
Persuading others to go along with the narcissist's preferences.

# What do you call a narcissist who is never vengeful?
A myth.

# Why does a narcissist often fail to keep his/her word?
Because a narcissist's promise is the narcissist's own property. So the narcissist has a right to break his/her promise if he/she wishes.

# What do you call a narcissist who learns to empathize with other people?
Cured! (the inability to empathize properly with others is a key feature of pathological narcissism)